Recruiting top talent is crucial for business growth and success. However, the process of sourcing, evaluating, and hiring the right candidates is often resource-intensive and time-consuming, placing significant strain on an organization.
This article offers a financial analysis and comparison between in-house recruitment and using a recruitment agency. It examines the true cost associated with agency recruitment and highlights the benefits of partnering with a recruitment agency. Thus, businesses can make informed decisions to streamline their hiring processes and lighten their operational load.
The Cost of Recruitment: In-House Recruitment vs Recruitment Agency
Recruitment is a complex process, as employees are some of the most dynamic parts of the way a company works. The recruitment process involves posting jobs, screening applications, conducting multiple interview rounds, selecting candidates, extending job offers, and onboarding. Relying on hiring experts throughout this process is often the most effective way to secure top talent that takes organizations to new heights of success.
Understanding the differences between in-house recruitment and agency recruitment is beneficial for companies deciding whether to manage recruitment internally, outsource it to an agency, or use a combination of both. In this section, we’ll define in-house and agency recruitment and highlight key cost differences between the two approaches, enabling companies to select the most practical and effective recruitment strategy.
Definitions: In-house Recruitment and Recruiting Agency
In-house recruitment refers to a company having an HR department and a team of skilled recruiters who manage, execute, and oversee the entire recruitment process. This involves a range of steps, from job postings and assessing applications to conducting interviews and extending job offers. They help develop your company’s recruiting plan and work with your managers to anticipate hiring needs. Internal recruiters also help with other administrative or HR tasks. In-house recruitment also provides autonomy over the hiring process, which some companies prefer.
On the other hand, agency recruitment refers to using a third-party organization when recruiting new talent. This involves requesting staff members from a recruitment agency that meets certain standards, with the agency handling the entire recruitment process and ultimately presenting candidates for your team. The company itself has minimal involvement in the process aside from providing the initial person specification that the agency uses as a guide for recruitment.
Cost Comparison: In-house Recruitment versus Recruiting Agency
Comparing the cost of in-house recruitment and agency recruitment helps companies determine which option fits into their budget better. For instance, when you use a recruiting agency, you pay only when you need a candidate. If you only hire occasionally, an agency is likely the most cost-effective option because of this. The cost varies, according to the type of fee structure, but it’s typically a percentage of the salary for the position you’re filling.
If you hire an internal recruiter, you’ll have to pay the standard salary, along with the benefits and expenses for things like paid time off, insurance, and any extra perks you offer. This can work if your company hires frequently.
Companies should compare the total cost of hiring an internal recruiter with the average expense of using a recruitment agency to determine which option is more cost-effective and aligns better with their hiring needs.
Sourcing, Screening, Assessing, and Interviewing
Posting on popular job boards and industry-specific sites can become costly very quickly. Premium listings, featured ads, and sponsored posts increase visibility but come with higher fees. Similarly, background checks, skills assessments, and personality tests are essential for evaluating candidate suitability. These services often require external vendors, adding to the overall expense. Lastly, investing in recruitment tools for screening, assessing, and interviewing candidates that are continuously advancing can also add up the costs.
In-house Recruitment: Using a specific in-house recruiter in a company has a relatively high cost. This is because the company hires a recruiter themselves, paying for the recruitment costs, training costs, and salary of the recruiter before engaging in any recruitment activities. In-house recruiters also require a budget for recruitment tools, job advertising, and other administrative tasks. This cost continues even when the company isn't recruiting. One way of making in-house recruitment cheaper is by expanding an internal recruiter’s portfolio of responsibilities.
Recruiting Agency: Using a recruiting agency has less of an associated cost. Some recruiting agencies charge a percentage of the salary of the new hire while other agencies charge a flat or hourly fee for recruitment services. Most agencies have a variety of fee structures that companies can choose from. You pay recruitment agencies when you have vacant roles in need of quality candidates rather than paying for a recruitment agency year-round as you would an internal recruiter. This is ideal for companies that hire employees occasionally, as it restricts the costs that companies pay for their recruitment processes.
Networking and Building Talent Pools
Hiring experienced internal recruiters with vast networks and strong talent pools can be expensive because of their annual salary. Similarly, partnering with reputable, well-established agencies may come at a higher cost compared to other agencies in the market.
In-House Recruitment: In-house recruiters build their talent pool using various sources, including a database of previous applicants who may be suited for different roles within the company, professional social media sites, and other companies in the industry.
Recruiting Agency: Agencies use similar sources as in-house recruiters when building a pool of potential candidates. However, a key advantage of using an agency is its membership and network. Many agencies maintain a roster of highly skilled candidates within the industry, proactively reaching out when appropriate vacancies arise and encouraging them to apply. This provides an edge over an in-house recruiter, as agencies continuously build an extensive database of qualified candidates from past vacancies.
Investing Time and Managing Workload
The time spent by recruitment teams in crafting job descriptions, reviewing resumes, conducting interviews, and communicating with candidates is substantial. This time investment translates directly into financial costs, as these hours could be spent on core business activities.
In-house Recruitment: An in-house recruiter is expected to carry out the activities mentioned above, along with payroll, benefits, and employee relations. The heavy workload often leads to burnout and decreased efficiency. However, the advantage having an in-house recruiter only working for you is that they’re more likely to focus on finding a good match. They’re typically people-focused instead of sales-focused. In-house recruiters often have more of a commitment to the company and want to find new employees who will stay long-term.
Recruiting Agency: When companies partner with a recruiting agency, they hand out the entire recruitment process to them, saving time and allowing internal resources to focus on greater business goals. However, agency recruiters are often sales-driven. Once the job is done, the agency recruiter doesn’t have to continue working with the new hire, so they might not be as concerned with finding an ideal match that works with your company culture. They want to fill the position, earn compensation, and move to the next position.
Expertise and Cultural Alignment
Companies need recruiters who not only align with the culture but also possess the necessary recruitment skills and industry expertise. Without dedicated recruitment expertise, the hiring process can become inconsistent and lead to subpar hires. This results in higher turnover rates, which, in turn, repeats the cycle of recruitment costs and increased operational strain.
In-house Recruitment: As an employee, the internal recruiter understands the company culture well, so they can find candidates who complement it. In addition, they don’t have to learn about multiple companies like agency recruiters do. This way they can fully immerse themselves in the organizational differences of your company. Similarly, industries such as manufacturing, computing, and engineering can benefit from in-house recruiting, as in-house recruiters know the specific requirements, qualifications, and experience for various staff positions. They then use this information to hire the most appropriate candidates and limit training time for new hires.
Recruiting Agency: Recruiting agencies are experts in recruiting methods, and they often understand the technical aspects of jobs. While there are some recruitment agencies that work broadly and service any company that requires new hires, there are also agencies that specialize in a certain industry or type of position. They become well-versed in what makes a good candidate on paper and learn the most beneficial qualifications and experience. Competent recruiting agencies work with the company to understand its values, culture, and ethics and build long-lasting relationships. This frees leaders and managers to handle other critical tasks.
Speed and Flexibility
The longer a position remains unfilled, the greater the impact on productivity and revenue. Delays in hiring can stall projects, overburden existing staff, and lead to burnout and reduced morale.
Similarly, companies should consider whether their recruiting needs are consistent or fluctuate. For instance, it might not be cost-effective for companies to employ in-house recruiters when they hire infrequently.
In-house Recruitment: In-house recruiters often take more time to hire. They spend more time working with managers to define the needs and preferences for the candidate to ensure a good fit for the company. If the company doesn’t already have a candidate pool, they’ll have to source all candidates from scratch, which takes more time. Similarly, when you hire a full-time in-house recruiter, you need to have enough duties to keep that person busy year-round. If you don’t have enough for them to do, either for recruiting or related to HR in some way, you’re likely wasting money on your recruiter’s salary and benefits.
Recruiting Agency: Using a recruiting agency can be a faster way to fill your vacancies. Agency recruiters often have several candidates in the pipeline that are seeking jobs. They can quickly match those candidates with your needs to find the top options. Agency recruiting is a fast-paced career, and the recruiters are motivated to get the commission from finding you a match, so they often move faster. Similarly, hiring a recruitment agency gives you more flexibility if you don’t have a huge, ongoing recruitment load. Companies can simply call on their recruitment agency when they need help finding candidates.
Final Comments
While having an in-house recruitment team has benefits, such as cultural alignment and expertise, recruiting agencies can provide similar advantages by specializing in specific industries and building long-lasting relationships with client companies. By partnering with a recruiting agency, businesses can have a more flexible hiring process, scale recruitment needs as required, leverage specialised expertise, reduce costs, and ensure a more efficient and effective hiring process. In the long run, this strategic move can improve hiring outcomes and operational efficiency to create stronger, more focused organisations.
To gain valuable insights on how your company can streamline hiring processes, reduce costs, and access expert recruiters, sign up for our newsletter.